|
|
|
Catechism of the Catholic Church
2370 Periodic continence, that is, the
methods of birth regulation based on self-observation and the use of
infertile periods, is in conformity with the objective criteria of
morality. These methods respect the bodies of the spouses, encourage
tenderness between them, and favor the education ...
more
|
|
Church Documents
Of Human Life (Humanae Vitae) read an excerpt
here...
Gospel of Life (Evangelium Vitae) read an
excerpt here...
The Role of the Christian Family in the Modern World
(Familiaris Consortio) read an excerpt
here...
|
|
Links to articles and websites on
Contraception and Natural Family Planning
Catholic Organization for Life and Family -
publications
National Catholic Bioethics Centre - NCCB -
articles by
Father Tad Pacholczyk
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops -
Contraception
- Natural Family
Planning
Links to Natural Family Planning
Organizations
WOOMB Canada
(Billing Ovulation Method)
Serena
- (Sympto-Thermal Method)
Creighton
Model - FertilityCare System
NaproTechnology
|
|
continued from above....
of an authentic freedom. In
contrast, "every action which, whether in anticipation of the
conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its
natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to
render procreation impossible" is intrinsically evil:
Thus the innate language that expresses the total reciprocal
self-giving of husband and wife is overlaid, through contraception,
by an objectively contradictory language, namely, that of not giving
oneself totally to the other. This leads not only to a positive
refusal to be open to life but also to a falsification of the inner
truth of conjugal love, which is called upon to give itself in
personal totality. . . . The difference, both anthropological and
moral, between contraception and recourse to the rhythm of the cycle
. . . involves in the final analysis two irreconcilable concepts of
the human person and of human sexuality.
1653 The fruitfulness of conjugal love extends to the fruits
of the moral, spiritual, and supernatural life that parents hand on
to their children by education. Parents are the principal and first
educators of their children. In this sense the fundamental task of
marriage and family is to be at the service of life.
1654 Spouses to whom God has not granted children can
nevertheless have a conjugal life full of meaning, in both human and
Christian terms. Their marriage can radiate a fruitfulness of
charity, of hospitality, and of sacrifice.
|
|
Excerpt from Gospel of Life
It is frequently asserted that
contraception, if made safe and available to all, is the most
effective remedy against abortion. The Catholic Church is then
accused of actually promoting abortion, because she obstinately
continues to teach the moral unlawfulness of contraception. When
looked at carefully, this objection is clearly unfounded. It may be
that many people use contraception with a view to excluding the
subsequent temptation of abortion. But the negative values inherent
in the "contraceptive mentality"-which is very different from
responsible parenthood, lived in respect for the full truth of the
conjugal act-are such that they in fact strengthen this temptation
when an unwanted life is conceived. Indeed, the pro- abortion
culture is especially strong precisely where the Church's teaching
on contraception is rejected. Certainly, from the moral point of
view contraception and abortion are specifically different evils:
the former contradicts the full truth of the sexual act as the
proper expression of conjugal love, while the latter destroys the
life of a human being; the former is opposed to the virtue of
chastity in marriage, the latter is opposed to the virtue of justice
and directly violates the divine commandment "You shall not kill".
But despite their differences of nature and moral gravity,
contraception and abortion are often closely connected, as fruits of
the same tree. It is true that in many cases contraception and even
abortion are practised under the pressure of real- life
difficulties, which nonetheless can never exonerate from striving to
observe God's law fully. Still, in very many other instances such
practices are rooted in a hedonistic mentality unwilling to accept
responsibility in matters of sexuality, and they imply a
self-centered concept of freedom, which regards procreation as an
obstacle to personal fulfilment. The life which could result from a
sexual encounter thus becomes an enemy to be avoided at all costs,
and abortion becomes the only possible decisive response to failed
contraception.
The close connection which exists, in mentality, between the
practice of contraception and that of abortion is becoming
increasingly obvious. It is being demonstrated in an alarming way by
the development of chemical products, intrauterine devices and
vaccines which, distributed with the same ease as contraceptives,
really act as abortifacients in the very early stages of the
development of the life of the new human being.
|
|
Excerpt from Humanae Vitae
Unlawful Birth Control
Methods
14. Therefore We base Our words on the first principles of a human
and Christian doctrine of marriage when We are obliged once more to
declare that the direct interruption of the generative process
already begun and, above all, all direct abortion, even for
therapeutic reasons, are to be absolutely excluded as lawful means
of regulating the number of children. Equally to be condemned, as
the magisterium of the Church has affirmed on many occasions, is
direct sterilization, whether of the man or of the woman, whether
permanent or temporary.
Similarly excluded is any action which either before, at the moment
of, or after sexual intercourse, is specifically intended to prevent
procreation—whether as an end or as a means.
Neither is it valid to argue, as a justification for sexual
intercourse which is deliberately contraceptive, that a lesser evil
is to be preferred to a greater one, or that such intercourse would
merge with procreative acts of past and future to form a single
entity, and so be qualified by exactly the same moral goodness as
these. Though it is true that sometimes it is lawful to tolerate a
lesser moral evil in order to avoid a greater evil or in order to
promote a greater good," it is never lawful, even for the gravest
reasons, to do evil that good may come of it —in other words, to
intend directly something which of its very nature contradicts the
moral order, and which must therefore be judged unworthy of man,
even though the intention is to protect or promote the welfare of an
individual, of a family or of society in general. Consequently, it
is a serious error to think that a whole married life of otherwise
normal relations can justify sexual intercourse which is
deliberately contraceptive and so intrinsically wrong.
|
|
Excerpt from Familiaris Consortio
When couples, by means of
recourse to contraception, separate these two meanings that God the
Creator has inscribed in the being of man and woman and in the
dynamism of their sexual communion, they act as "arbiters" of the
divine plan and they "manipulate" and degrade human sexuality-and
with it themselves and their married partner-by altering its value
of "total" self-giving. Thus the innate language that expresses the
total reciprocal self-giving of husband and wife is overlaid,
through contraception, by an objectively contradictory language,
namely, that of not giving oneself totally to the other. This leads
not only to a positive refusal to be open to life but also to a
falsification of the inner truth of conjugal love, which is called
upon to give itself in personal totality.
When, instead, by means of recourse to periods of infertility, the
couple respect the inseparable connection between the unitive and
procreative meanings of human sexuality, they are acting as
"ministers" of God's plan and they "benefit from" their sexuality
according to the original dynamism of "total" selfgiving, without
manipulation or alteration.
In the light of the experience of many couples and of the data
provided by the different human sciences, theological reflection is
able to perceive and is called to study further the difference, both
anthropological and moral, between contraception and recourse to the
rhythm of the cycle: it is a difference which is much wider and
deeper than is usually thought, one which involves in the final
analysis two irreconcilable concepts of the human person and of
human sexuality. The choice of the natural rhythms involves
accepting the cycle of the person, that is the woman, and thereby
accepting dialogue, reciprocal respect, shared responsibility and
self- control. To accept the cycle and to enter into dialogue means
to recognize both the spiritual and corporal character of conjugal
communion and to live personal love with its requirement of
fidelity. In this context the couple comes to experience how
conjugal communion is enriched with those values of tenderness and
affection which constitute the inner soul of human sexuality, in its
physical dimension also. In this way sexuality is respected and
promoted in its truly and fully human dimension, and is never "used"
as an "object" that, by breaking the personal unity of soul and
body, strikes at God's creation itself at the level of the deepest
interaction of nature and person.
|
ome
►
|
|
|
© Copyright Archdiocese of Vancouver |
|
|